?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Hopefully this will be a series of articles/essays about the oddities of neopagan/paleopagan/heathen cross-fertilization.


I was discussing the existence of "dual-trad" pagans/heathens with a fellow pagan/heathen today. Now, when I was starting out as a pagan, "trad-hopping" was considered an indication of inability to focus and learn any tradition, and generally was characterized as flightiness at best, insincerity and laziness at worst. Yet many of the people I respect most in the community have studied, in depth and/or lightly, at least two or three trads.

Add to this conundrum that a person may keep the same practices but worship different pantheons either sequentially or simultaneously. Their religious outlook may be pantheist or polytheist (or both), and their ritual practice may be derived from any number of neo-pagan, paleo-pagan, reconstructionist, and/or anthropological sources. You really can't tell the players without a scorecard!

In theory, it is possible, and mostly respectable, to have a person who has studied Brit Trad Wicca, Golden Dawn style Ceremonial Magic(k) and Hermetics who worships Odin, Kali, and the Morrigan using Eclectic Pagan ritual formats! Now, many single trad people shudder at this, and I can see why. If American Indian shamanic practices there would undoubtedly be cries of outrage about cultural theft and defilment. These may even be valid. But what if the individual was part Welsh, part German, part East Indian, and part Native American?

I have personaly had someone disapprove strongly of me wanting to sanctify the perimeter of a ritual site with a burning cigarette. I didn't have incense (and am allerfic to the cheap stuff), and the ritual site was in North America. One could easily argue that the land and the local spirits would be most pleased and accustomed to this style of offering! Was such a concept unacceptable trad mixing/culture stealing, or was it consideration of the land and it's spirits?

Then you have traditions like my own, which have multiple components: an ethical system/philosophy, a magical praxis, a theology, and a mandate to learn about, preferrably with some depth, as many other traditions and/or religions as possible! I honor various gods and pantheons, either within the ritual format of their native tradition, if I know it, or within my "base tradition"'s ritual and/or shamanic format. I am beginning to suspect that this is not all that uncommon, but is not often talked about for fear of offending the purists, single trad neophytes (that may become confused), or strict reconstructionists, paleopagan protectors, and cultural defenders.

The first task, of course, is to cleave the definitions into something manageable. Therefore:

Religion
Most simply, a system of beliefs about the origins of the universe, beliefs about our place and purpose in it, and practices for worshiping, acknowledging, or honoring forces outside ourselves, either natural* or deific.
* Please note that some regard deities and spirits, etc, as natural phenomena of varying types and degrees
Tradition
A set of practices and observances, usually within a religion or philosophy, that is taught to adherents as a cohesive set. Another related concept is "sect". For example: Christianity is a religion; Baptist, Presbyterian, and Catholic are traditions within that religion.
Pantheon
The gods, demigods, and other non-corporeal entities of power or worship (or fear) that are the central point of a specific culture's dominant religion.

The reason, of course, for these definitions is to provide a definition of the assumptions that I'm using in these essays.

Comments so far?

Comments

ex_kerravon856
Dec. 2nd, 2004 01:33 pm (UTC)
Trads...
The irony of the single trad path is that these very trads are themselves formed from elements of other trads. Much like Chinese martial arts styles (the ones with which I am most familiar), such as the "traditional" style I studied starting back in early 1970's of "Northern Shaolin Praying Mantis"...when it was actually comprised of, at is origin, of Monkey Style footwork, grafted onto "made-up" movements discovered by observing a mantis fighting against a cicada.

Part traditional, and yet part eclectic, like most trads of anything really are, if traced back far enough. One of those in which I was trained, Gardnerian Craft, has elements descending from English, French, Scandinavian, even Masonic origins to begin with (as my HP indicated), with Welsh, Irish and other influences being added later on. And this is a supposedly "older" tradition, of which many adherents I know are rather traditional about it, while others are more eclectic in their practice. Borrowing from several paths to define my own, I am more of the second category.

Or, to sum up (and in agreement to what lysana put so succinctly): What she said. ;-)

Latest Month

August 2018
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner